intersting.

Does anyone else this it ironic that in Muncie there exists a band named "Losing September" and a band called "Stealing September"?

Losing September has been together for years longer than Stealing September, who's bio states "How did we get our name? We did what all great bands do. We stole it. We stole it in September ironically enough."

Interesting.

HR 4379

HR4379 is intended to allow Republicans in Congress to completely remove the Supreme Court. No joke. Not only that, it makes it illegal to judge on sexuality and reproduction. If this passes, it seems to me every state will be on it's own to determine laws, which seems to me would turn into quite a nice little civil war later on down the road.

The federal courts, including the Supreme Court, have shown that they are currently incapable of issuing correct rulings based upon a strict interpretation of the Constitution or of the laws that Congress or states pass. Liberal judges impose their own political agendas in their decisions and usurp the power of the American people to govern themselves. Judges have replaced our Republican form of government with a judicial oligarchy—the rule of judges.

To fight against this judicial tyranny Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) to secure passage of the “We, The People Act,” (H.R. 4379).

Rep. Paul’s act is simple: It enforces the powers of Congress under Articles 1, Section 8, III, Sections 1-2 of the Constitution to restrict the authority of federal courts (including the Supreme Court) from hearing specific cases. This Article also gives Congress authority to establish, split, or abolish federal courts!

-"Alain's Newsletter", a conservative religion enforcing blogger

HR4379 We the People Act

To limit the jurisdiction of the Federal courts, and for other purposes.

[...]

SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON JURISDICTION.
The Supreme Court of the United States and each Federal court--

(1) shall not adjudicate--

(A) any claim involving the laws, regulations, or policies of any State or unit of local government relating to the free exercise or establishment of religion;

(B) any claim based upon the right of privacy, including any such claim related to any issue of sexual practices, orientation, or reproduction; or

(C) any claim based upon equal protection of the laws to the extent such claim is based upon the right to marry without regard to sex or sexual orientation; and

(2) shall not rely on any judicial decision involving any issue referred to in paragraph (1).

SEC. 4. REGULATION OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION.
The Supreme Court of the United States and all other Federal courts--

(1) are not prevented from determining the constitutionality of any Federal statute or administrative rule or procedure in considering any case arising under the Constitution of the United States; and

(2) shall not issue any order, final judgment, or other ruling that appropriates or expends money, imposes taxes, or otherwise interferes with the legislative functions or administrative discretion of the several States and their subdivisions.

SEC. 5. JURISDICTIONAL CHALLENGES.

Any party or intervener in any matter before any Federal court, including the Supreme Court, may challenge the jurisdiction of the court under section 3 or 4 during any proceeding or appeal relating to that matter.

SEC. 6. MATERIAL BREACHES OF GOOD BEHAVIOR AND REMEDY.
A violation by a justice or a judge of any of the provisions of section 3 or 4 shall be an impeachable offense, and a material breach of good behavior subject to removal by the President of the United States according to rules and procedures established by the Congress.

SEC. 7. CASES DECIDED UNDER ISSUES REMOVED FROM FEDERAL JURISDICTION NO LONGER BINDING PRECEDENT.
Any decision of a Federal court, to the extent that the decision relates to an issue removed from Federal jurisdiction under section 3, is not binding precedent on any State court.

It makes me sick that they name it "We the People" Act. It's like the Patriot Act.. which no true patriot would have approved of.